Dear diary,
In my neighborhood there are many families that have children. I hear their kids playing outdoors when I am reading. I like the sound of children playing; it’s like the sound of birds singing: When I hear either of these sounds, I assume that at least there is peace in this part of the world: For during warfare, when guns are firing and slaughter is occurring, children will usually not laugh and giggle, and birds will not sing; only when the gunfire and slaughter cease will the birds start to sing again, and the children return to their play.
But even when there is peace where I live, I still feel dissatisfied; for I cannot relax and enjoy life unless I know that absolutely every living creature is content. Yet I am aware that there are parts of the globe where the birds are mute, and children are neither laughing nor playing, because violence is raging. If I had kids of my own, and you said to me: “Just be thankful that your children live in a peaceful part of the earth.” I would answer you: “It’s too hard; I cannot stop thinking about the kids who are suffering elsewhere. Not until there is peace everywhere will I be able to enjoy our local peace.”
Am I stupid, to feel this way? I wonder. For what would it be like if the entire planet became peaceful, and all the violent evil mayhem stopped happening, so that the whole globe had no more war. Let’s even say that all abuse of every kind ended: people stopped even swindling each other: All of Earth became like the Christian God’s Heaven. Would I finally be able, at that point, to rejoice in the health and welfare of my own children, who are now part of a global contentment? No. And why? Because although the problem is solved for our own sphere, I would now begin to pity all the other spheres in our solar system. Look: Mars is a murder zone, and Venus is overrun with whoredoms; Mercury is a Hell on Earth; Saturn is corrupt. The only nice place to live is on Jupiter, within the Red Spot, where Yahweh and I have our mansions for eternity. All the other planets are bad.
Moreover, although the Earth itself is at peace, the earthlings still swindle each other: I know that they claim they do not, but they are liars. This peace that they achieved will not last, either: their God keeps truckloads of weapons stashed in his Holy Habitation, because he fears another mutiny.
And the world is a big place, so even if I could find a way to make all the spheres within our own solar system paradisal, there will always be clusters of systems beyond this sun from which I can suck disgruntlement. The number of planets is infinite, and all their civilizations are as barbaric as ours.
What is the solution, then? Just stop caring about my neighbors? Develop false pride in place and blood? Say: “O well, at least my own kids are not getting bombed”?
Is it too tall an order, to care for one’s own family as well as all the families in the outer darkness?
I’m now thinking of the Sun at the center of our solar system. It gives us its light, and we sing praises to it. But does it withhold its light from all the other galaxies? No, it gives its light to them, too; but they do not thank it, because the amount of light that they get from our Sun is minimal: it just appears as a pinpoint in their night sky; whereas, to us, it brightens up our whole day. – Now, what if our Sun were to decide to help some group of spheres far away, and send the bulk of its light to them, while neglecting us who orbit about it faithfully? Some foreign zone that exists many megameters away would enjoy a warm, bright morning because Mister Sun chose to leave his earthlings in the lurch and instead to have an affair with her. Then, people who live in New York and California would experience nonstop nighttime: when they walk through their cities, to avoid bumping into each other, they’d need to depend upon their streetlamps; and when they look up into the firmament, which used to boast a great blazing orb, it now holds only a dim orangey blob, about the size of a cantaloupe: for all its photons were shipped overspace.
I guess what I’m saying is . . . Actually, I’m not quite sure what I’m saying. Maybe my message is: Don’t abandon your biological children for the sake of helping extraterrestrials. – But that’s not something that people need to hear: most people find it natural to neglect the beings who cannot be seen because they live far way; most people automatically favor the beings that live close by. This is not something they must be taught.
If you’re pacing through your neighbor’s garden, and a stray dog from the vicinity approaches you, you will share with this beast one of the tomatoes that you gleaned.
Does not the average person possess an instinct that would choose to nourish all worlds, if that were possible? If given the chance to feed all the starving galaxies that no earthling has yet discovered, what man is so heartless as to say: “No, hold back the aid from those populations, because I do not count them among my trusted allies”?
I can see this man asking, however: “If I permit those unknown folks to be fed, will it mean that my own people will starve?” – Now say the answer is: “All of your people’s needs will remain met. The beings in question are so different from humans that they live off what you consider rather waste than sustenance: your trash is their treasure. In other words, you are being asked to send them not the leftover food from your feasts but what was inedible. Like how plants inhale what humans exhale, and vice versa; or how gods want only the bones and the fat from your sacrifices.” In this case, if the man refuses to feed the alien species, I would say he is meanspirited.
But I once saw a tramp take a sandwich out of his bindle with the aim of eating it. This was in a movie. The tramp opened his mouth to take a bite, but just then he noticed another tramp sitting under the bridge nearby; and this second fellow was obviously hungry: he was shivering and thin. So, the first tramp tore his sandwich and shared half with the starving stranger.
I like the idea of living on Easy Street. If only Jesus would come and pay people immediately, when they do kind acts; then I think more people would behave charitably. The problem is that you’ve got to wait until after you’re dead to get your reward. So you share your sandwich with a comrade, and then you and your fellow tramp live another day or two before dying from exposure; and when you get into heaven, Jesus awards you a bigger mansion than your friend, because of that one time you helped him: Jesus appreciates that you shared your food – he judges you fairly, but way too late. He should give you a big mansion when you’re still alive, on earth, so that you and your co-tramp could stay there, and not freeze to death.
It would also help if Jesus would punish evildoers more swiftly. Preferably, he should protect innocent people from evildoers before any harm is inflicted: I’m not talking about punishing criminals for crimes they haven’t yet committed; I’m saying that Jesus should stand between a woman and her attacker, and Jesus should block any punching fists, or any lunging knives, and he should stop all bullets. This way, the victim does not need to feel any pain, and the assailant can be spared the guilt of having sinned against Heaven. If this new style of policing is too demanding for Jesus, then he should just clone himself: then he could be in two places at once. I think that all you need, to make a clone, is a drop of blood from the source; and then you use a microscope and some computers and lightning bolts to create an exact replica. Jesus has plenty of blood: so this could work. Imagine having two Jesuses in the world. We’d have twice the love, twice the justice.
And this would also eliminate the problem of all those people who don’t believe in Jesus yet. Who is going to turn down the opportunity to be rescued from a violent rapist? No one’s going to say: “Just let the evildoer do his evil; I cannot accept help from a Christian Savior: that’s against my religion.” Come to think of it, I bet if Jesus intervenes to stop enough crimes that would otherwise have harmed heathens, infidels, and pagans, there would be no more nonbelievers left: for all these people would gladly convert, after their rescue, and be baptized. Imagine getting grabbed around the waist and lifted up into the sky by the mighty arm of Jesus, just as a vampire and a werewolf are chasing you down a dark alley: How many would-be victims, at this point, would turn down the Lord’s request that they join his church?
And if you decide to become Catholic, after Jesus saves your life, but then you recall that it will be difficult to break this news to your family, because they are all stubborn adherents to some type of Buddhism, don’t even worry about it: Jesus will help with this, too.








